TY - GEN
T1 - Impact of Error Rate Misreporting on Resource Allocation in Multi-tenant Quantum Computing and Defense
AU - Das, Subrata
AU - Ghosh, Swaroop
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
PY - 2025/6/29
Y1 - 2025/6/29
N2 - Cloud-based quantum service providers allow multiple users to run programs on shared hardware concurrently to maximize resource utilization and minimize operational costs. This multi-tenant computing (MTC) model relies on the error parameters of the hardware for fair qubit allocation and scheduling, as error-prone qubits can degrade computational accuracy asymmetrically for users sharing the hardware. To maintain low error rates, quantum providers perform periodic hardware calibration, often relying on third-party calibration services. If an adversary within this calibration service misreports error rates, the allocator can be misled into making suboptimal decisions even when the physical hardware remains unchanged. We demonstrate such an attack model in which an adversary strategically misreports qubit error rates to reduce hardware throughput, and probability of successful trial (PST) for two previously proposed allocation frameworks, i.e. Greedy and Community-Based Dynamic Allocation Partitioning (COMDAP) [12, 18]. Experimental results show that adversarial misreporting increases execution latency by 24% and reduces PST by 7.8%. We also propose to identify inconsistencies in reported error rates by analyzing statistical deviations in error rates across calibration cycles.
AB - Cloud-based quantum service providers allow multiple users to run programs on shared hardware concurrently to maximize resource utilization and minimize operational costs. This multi-tenant computing (MTC) model relies on the error parameters of the hardware for fair qubit allocation and scheduling, as error-prone qubits can degrade computational accuracy asymmetrically for users sharing the hardware. To maintain low error rates, quantum providers perform periodic hardware calibration, often relying on third-party calibration services. If an adversary within this calibration service misreports error rates, the allocator can be misled into making suboptimal decisions even when the physical hardware remains unchanged. We demonstrate such an attack model in which an adversary strategically misreports qubit error rates to reduce hardware throughput, and probability of successful trial (PST) for two previously proposed allocation frameworks, i.e. Greedy and Community-Based Dynamic Allocation Partitioning (COMDAP) [12, 18]. Experimental results show that adversarial misreporting increases execution latency by 24% and reduces PST by 7.8%. We also propose to identify inconsistencies in reported error rates by analyzing statistical deviations in error rates across calibration cycles.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105017624943
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105017624943#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1145/3716368.3735191
DO - 10.1145/3716368.3735191
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105017624943
T3 - Proceedings of the ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI, GLSVLSI
SP - 155
EP - 160
BT - GLSVLSI 2025 - Proceedings of the Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI 2025
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
T2 - 35th Edition of the Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI 2025, GLSVLSI 2025
Y2 - 30 June 2025 through 2 July 2025
ER -