TY - JOUR
T1 - Impacts of management on ecosystem service capacity in northeastern U.S. Appalachian forest stands
AU - Lockwood, Ben
AU - Kaye, Margot
AU - Maynard-Bean, Erynn
AU - Fernández, Margarita
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Forests are critical resources that provide multiple ecosystem services. However, the capacity to produce these services depends on how forests are managed. The northeastern US is a highly forested and densely populated area with a strong potential for delivering multiple ecosystem services to owners of small, private forestlands. Thus, our objective was to quantify the impacts of harvesting on small forest stands in a northeastern US Appalachian forest. We leveraged existing harvest and inventory data to assess how harvest intensity, harvest type, and time since harvest completion play a role in forest productivity and biodiversity changes over time. In general, lower harvest intensities and longer times since completion improved forest stand ecosystem capacity. Harvesting at intensities of 30% or less of biomass removal and time durations of at least 15 years post-harvest allowed stands to recuperate carbon losses and improve biodiversity metrics. These results align well with previous recommendations of lower harvest intensities and longer rotations, and also suggest that co-production of multiple ecosystem services has potential for small forestland owners to manage their resource sustainably.
AB - Forests are critical resources that provide multiple ecosystem services. However, the capacity to produce these services depends on how forests are managed. The northeastern US is a highly forested and densely populated area with a strong potential for delivering multiple ecosystem services to owners of small, private forestlands. Thus, our objective was to quantify the impacts of harvesting on small forest stands in a northeastern US Appalachian forest. We leveraged existing harvest and inventory data to assess how harvest intensity, harvest type, and time since harvest completion play a role in forest productivity and biodiversity changes over time. In general, lower harvest intensities and longer times since completion improved forest stand ecosystem capacity. Harvesting at intensities of 30% or less of biomass removal and time durations of at least 15 years post-harvest allowed stands to recuperate carbon losses and improve biodiversity metrics. These results align well with previous recommendations of lower harvest intensities and longer rotations, and also suggest that co-production of multiple ecosystem services has potential for small forestland owners to manage their resource sustainably.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020851657
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105020851657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1139/cjfr-2025-0071
DO - 10.1139/cjfr-2025-0071
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105020851657
SN - 0045-5067
VL - 55
JO - Canadian Journal of Forest Research
JF - Canadian Journal of Forest Research
ER -