Abstract
Research in implementation science has shown that interventions are rarely implemented as designed, and that variability in implementation is associated with variability in outcomes. Lack of programme fidelity has been seen as the prime cause of poor outcomes, though it has also been suggested that this must be balanced against adaptation. In this chapter, we argue that what is required is a focus on quality, of both fidelity and adaptation. This reframing has implications for programme development processes, research and evaluation, and the training and support of practitioners in the field.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Mental Health and Wellbeing through Schools |
| Subtitle of host publication | The Way Forward |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis Inc. |
| Pages | 53-63 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781317655053 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780415745185 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 14 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Social Sciences
- General Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Implementing for success in school-based mental health promotion: The role of quality in resolving the tension between fidelity and adaptation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver