Abstract
Claims regarding negative strong reciprocity do indeed rest on experiments lacking established external validity, often without even a small menu of options. Guala's review should prompt strong reciprocity proponents to extend the real-world validity of their work, exploring the preferences participants bring to experiments. That said, Guala's approach fails to differentiate among group selection approaches and glosses over cross-cultural variability.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 34-35 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2012 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience