TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving cervical cancer screening in hospital settings
AU - Klassen, Ann
AU - Hall, Allyson
AU - Bowie, Janice
AU - Weisman, Carol S.
N1 - Funding Information:
In 1993 we received funding from the National Cancer Institute to investigate the organizational and professional behaviors related to inpatient Pap testing. We used three different sources of information to examine this issue.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Background: Identifying opportunities to offer cervical cancer screening to underscreened women is important for increasing early detection. Maryland law mandates offering Pap tests during hospital admissions. We examined organizational and physician attitudes and practices regarding inpatient screening, to identify mechanisms for increasing the law's effectiveness. Methods: We analyzed state admission data, a hospital administrators telephone survey, and a mailed survey of Maryland primary and specialty care physicians, to identify overall patterns and subgroup differences regarding screening. Results: Overall, we found significant concern regarding cancer, and evidence of policies and procedures for screening. However, most hospitals and providers offered screening without assessing clinical need or including persuasive recommendations. Providers with significantly less engagement in preventive assessment and screening included medical and surgical subspecialists and non-primary care providers. Providers to African-American and Medical Assistance women were also less likely to have knowledge, attitudes, and practices conducive to inpatient screening. Conclusions: Adequate support and infrastructure for preventive screening exist within hospitals. Adding clinical assessment and persuasive education could increase the impact of these mechanisms, and improve prevention among underscreened inpatient populations. (C) 2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
AB - Background: Identifying opportunities to offer cervical cancer screening to underscreened women is important for increasing early detection. Maryland law mandates offering Pap tests during hospital admissions. We examined organizational and physician attitudes and practices regarding inpatient screening, to identify mechanisms for increasing the law's effectiveness. Methods: We analyzed state admission data, a hospital administrators telephone survey, and a mailed survey of Maryland primary and specialty care physicians, to identify overall patterns and subgroup differences regarding screening. Results: Overall, we found significant concern regarding cancer, and evidence of policies and procedures for screening. However, most hospitals and providers offered screening without assessing clinical need or including persuasive recommendations. Providers with significantly less engagement in preventive assessment and screening included medical and surgical subspecialists and non-primary care providers. Providers to African-American and Medical Assistance women were also less likely to have knowledge, attitudes, and practices conducive to inpatient screening. Conclusions: Adequate support and infrastructure for preventive screening exist within hospitals. Adding clinical assessment and persuasive education could increase the impact of these mechanisms, and improve prevention among underscreened inpatient populations. (C) 2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033746480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033746480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/pmed.2000.0749
DO - 10.1006/pmed.2000.0749
M3 - Article
C2 - 11071834
AN - SCOPUS:0033746480
SN - 0091-7435
VL - 31
SP - 538
EP - 546
JO - Preventive Medicine
JF - Preventive Medicine
IS - 5
ER -