TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving probabilistic monthly water quantity and quality predictions using a simplified residual-based modeling approach
AU - Guo, Tian
AU - Liu, Yaoze
AU - Shao, Gang
AU - Engel, Bernard A.
AU - Sharma, Ashish
AU - Marshall, Lucy A.
AU - Flanagan, Dennis C.
AU - Cibin, Raj
AU - Wallace, Carlington W.
AU - Zhao, Kaiguang
AU - Ren, Dongyang
AU - Vera Mercado, Johann
AU - Aboelnour, Mohamed A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Uncertainty quantification between simulated and observed water quality simulations needs to be improved. This study generated and evaluated probabilistic hydrologic and water quality predictions in 18 locations across the U.S. using residual-based modeling. A Box-Cox transformation scheme group provided the best predictive uncertainties for all case studies. The tradeoffs in the performance metrics for a single variable predictive uncertainty in a single study watershed were more obvious than those for all hydrologic or water quality cases. Compared to a single realization of simulations, the ensemble average of hydrologic and water quality simulations better represented the predictive uncertainty, especially for large watersheds. This study recommends various opportunities via residual error scheme selection, data monitoring improvement, and hydrologic model enhancement to robust hydrologic and water quality predictive uncertainties. The results could improve the quantification of the predictive uncertainty of hydrologic and water quality simulations and guide probabilistic prediction enhancement.
AB - Uncertainty quantification between simulated and observed water quality simulations needs to be improved. This study generated and evaluated probabilistic hydrologic and water quality predictions in 18 locations across the U.S. using residual-based modeling. A Box-Cox transformation scheme group provided the best predictive uncertainties for all case studies. The tradeoffs in the performance metrics for a single variable predictive uncertainty in a single study watershed were more obvious than those for all hydrologic or water quality cases. Compared to a single realization of simulations, the ensemble average of hydrologic and water quality simulations better represented the predictive uncertainty, especially for large watersheds. This study recommends various opportunities via residual error scheme selection, data monitoring improvement, and hydrologic model enhancement to robust hydrologic and water quality predictive uncertainties. The results could improve the quantification of the predictive uncertainty of hydrologic and water quality simulations and guide probabilistic prediction enhancement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136286003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85136286003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105499
DO - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105499
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85136286003
SN - 1364-8152
VL - 156
JO - Environmental Modelling and Software
JF - Environmental Modelling and Software
M1 - 105499
ER -