Abstract
The ability of two canine pelvic osteotomy techniques to provide lateral rotation of the acetabulum was compared in vitro using an instrumented spatial linkage to measure acetabular displacement. Technique 1 was a double osteotomy and technique 2 was a triple osteotomy. We demonstrated that technique 1 provided more lateral rotation of the acetabulum. Both techniques provided a large amount of acetabular an‐teversion. No relationship could be found between pelvic morphometry and final acetabular position. We concluded that the surgeon is the primary factor controlling final acetabular position.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 139-142 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Veterinary Surgery |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 1981 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Veterinary