TY - JOUR
T1 - Incorporating Fluorine Substitution into Conjugated Polymers for Solar Cells
T2 - Three Different Means, Same Results
AU - Kelly, Mary Allison
AU - Roland, Steffen
AU - Zhang, Qianqian
AU - Lee, Youngmin
AU - Kabius, Bernd
AU - Wang, Qing
AU - Gomez, Enrique D.
AU - Neher, Dieter
AU - You, Wei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2017/2/2
Y1 - 2017/2/2
N2 - Fluorinating conjugated polymers is a proven strategy for creating high performance materials in polymer solar cells, yet few studies have investigated the importance of the fluorination method. We compare the performance of three fluorinated systems: a poly(benzodithieno-dithienyltriazole) (PBnDT-XTAZ) random copolymer where 50% of the acceptor units are difluorinated, PBnDT-mFTAZ where every acceptor unit is monofluorinated, and a 1:1 physical blend of the difluorinated and nonfluorinated polymer. All systems have the same degree of fluorination (50%) yet via different methods (chemically vs physically, random vs regular). We show that these three systems have equivalent photovoltaic behavior: ∼5.2% efficiency with a short-circuit current (Jsc) at ∼11 mA cm-2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) at 0.77 V, and a fill factor (FF) of ∼60%. Further investigation of these three systems demonstrates that the charge generation, charge extraction, and charge transfer state are essentially identical for the three studied systems. Transmission electron microscopy shows no significant differences in the morphologies. All these data illustrate that it is possible to improve performance not only via regular or random fluorination but also by physical addition via a ternary blend. Thus, our results demonstrate the versatility of incorporating fluorine in the active layer of polymer solar cells to enhance device performance. (Graph Presented).
AB - Fluorinating conjugated polymers is a proven strategy for creating high performance materials in polymer solar cells, yet few studies have investigated the importance of the fluorination method. We compare the performance of three fluorinated systems: a poly(benzodithieno-dithienyltriazole) (PBnDT-XTAZ) random copolymer where 50% of the acceptor units are difluorinated, PBnDT-mFTAZ where every acceptor unit is monofluorinated, and a 1:1 physical blend of the difluorinated and nonfluorinated polymer. All systems have the same degree of fluorination (50%) yet via different methods (chemically vs physically, random vs regular). We show that these three systems have equivalent photovoltaic behavior: ∼5.2% efficiency with a short-circuit current (Jsc) at ∼11 mA cm-2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) at 0.77 V, and a fill factor (FF) of ∼60%. Further investigation of these three systems demonstrates that the charge generation, charge extraction, and charge transfer state are essentially identical for the three studied systems. Transmission electron microscopy shows no significant differences in the morphologies. All these data illustrate that it is possible to improve performance not only via regular or random fluorination but also by physical addition via a ternary blend. Thus, our results demonstrate the versatility of incorporating fluorine in the active layer of polymer solar cells to enhance device performance. (Graph Presented).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012932762&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012932762&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10993
DO - 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10993
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85012932762
SN - 1932-7447
VL - 121
SP - 2059
EP - 2068
JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry C
JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry C
IS - 4
ER -