TY - JOUR
T1 - Incorporating the benefits of vegetative filter strips into risk assessment and risk management of pesticides
AU - Chen, Huajin
AU - Carley, Danesha Seth
AU - Muñoz-Carpena, Rafael
AU - Ferruzzi, Giulio
AU - Yuan, Yongping
AU - Henry, Eric
AU - Blankinship, Amy
AU - Veith, Tamie L.
AU - Breckels, Ross
AU - Fox, Garey
AU - Luo, Yuzhou
AU - Osmond, Deanna
AU - Preisendanz, Heather E.
AU - Tang, Zhenxu
AU - Armbrust, Kevin
AU - Costello, Kevin
AU - McConnell, Laura L.
AU - Rice, Patricia
AU - Westgate, Johnny
AU - Whiteside, Mélanie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - The pesticide registration process in North America, including the USA and Canada, involves conducting a risk assessment based on relatively conservative modeling to predict pesticide concentrations in receiving waterbodies. The modeling framework does not consider some commonly adopted best management practices that can reduce the amount of pesticide that may reach a waterbody, such as vegetative filter strips (VFS). Currently, VFS are being used by growers as an effective way to reduce off-site movement of pesticides, and they are being required or recommended on pesticide labels as a mitigation measure. Given the regulatory need, a pair of multistakeholder workshops were held in Raleigh, North Carolina, to discuss how to incorporate VFS into pesticide risk assessment and risk management procedures within the North American regulatory framework. Because the risk assessment process depends heavily on modeling, one key question was how to quantitatively incorporate VFS into the existing modeling approach. Key outcomes from the workshops include the following: VFS have proven effective in reducing pesticide runoff to surface waterbodies when properly located, designed, implemented, and maintained; Vegetative Filter Strip Modeling System (VFSMOD), a science-based and widely validated mechanistic model, is suitable for further vetting as a quantitative simulation approach to pesticide mitigation with VFS in current regulatory settings; and VFSMOD parametrization rules need to be developed for the North American aquatic exposure assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:454–464.
AB - The pesticide registration process in North America, including the USA and Canada, involves conducting a risk assessment based on relatively conservative modeling to predict pesticide concentrations in receiving waterbodies. The modeling framework does not consider some commonly adopted best management practices that can reduce the amount of pesticide that may reach a waterbody, such as vegetative filter strips (VFS). Currently, VFS are being used by growers as an effective way to reduce off-site movement of pesticides, and they are being required or recommended on pesticide labels as a mitigation measure. Given the regulatory need, a pair of multistakeholder workshops were held in Raleigh, North Carolina, to discuss how to incorporate VFS into pesticide risk assessment and risk management procedures within the North American regulatory framework. Because the risk assessment process depends heavily on modeling, one key question was how to quantitatively incorporate VFS into the existing modeling approach. Key outcomes from the workshops include the following: VFS have proven effective in reducing pesticide runoff to surface waterbodies when properly located, designed, implemented, and maintained; Vegetative Filter Strip Modeling System (VFSMOD), a science-based and widely validated mechanistic model, is suitable for further vetting as a quantitative simulation approach to pesticide mitigation with VFS in current regulatory settings; and VFSMOD parametrization rules need to be developed for the North American aquatic exposure assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:454–464.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171581395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85171581395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ieam.4824
DO - 10.1002/ieam.4824
M3 - Article
C2 - 37527952
AN - SCOPUS:85171581395
SN - 1551-3793
VL - 20
SP - 454
EP - 464
JO - Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
JF - Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
IS - 2
ER -