TY - JOUR
T1 - Incorrect asymptotic size of subsampling procedures based on post-consistent model selection estimators
AU - Andrews, Donald W.K.
AU - Guggenberger, Patrik
N1 - Funding Information:
Andrews gratefully acknowledges the research support of the National Science Foundation via grant numbers SES-0417911 and SES-0751517. Guggenberger gratefully acknowledges research support from a Sloan fellowship, a faculty research grant from UCLA in 2005 and NSF grant SES-0748922. For helpful comments, we thank two referees, the Associate Editor Miguel Delgado, Victor Chernozukhov, Benedikt Pötscher, Azeem Shaikh, and the participants at various seminars and conferences at which the paper was presented. The results in this paper first appeared in Andrews and Guggenberger (2005) .
PY - 2009/9
Y1 - 2009/9
N2 - Subsampling and the m out of n bootstrap have been suggested in the literature as methods for carrying out inference based on post-model selection estimators and shrinkage estimators. In this paper we consider a subsampling confidence interval (CI) that is based on an estimator that can be viewed either as a post-model selection estimator that employs a consistent model selection procedure or as a super-efficient estimator. We show that the subsampling CI (of nominal level 1 - α for any α ∈ (0, 1)) has asymptotic confidence size (defined to be the limit of finite-sample size) equal to zero in a very simple regular model. The same result holds for the m out of n bootstrap provided m2 / n → 0 and the observations are i.i.d. Similar zero-asymptotic-confidence-size results hold in more complicated models that are covered by the general results given in the paper and for super-efficient and shrinkage estimators that are not post-model selection estimators. Based on these results, subsampling and the m out of n bootstrap are not recommended for obtaining inference based on post-consistent model selection or shrinkage estimators.
AB - Subsampling and the m out of n bootstrap have been suggested in the literature as methods for carrying out inference based on post-model selection estimators and shrinkage estimators. In this paper we consider a subsampling confidence interval (CI) that is based on an estimator that can be viewed either as a post-model selection estimator that employs a consistent model selection procedure or as a super-efficient estimator. We show that the subsampling CI (of nominal level 1 - α for any α ∈ (0, 1)) has asymptotic confidence size (defined to be the limit of finite-sample size) equal to zero in a very simple regular model. The same result holds for the m out of n bootstrap provided m2 / n → 0 and the observations are i.i.d. Similar zero-asymptotic-confidence-size results hold in more complicated models that are covered by the general results given in the paper and for super-efficient and shrinkage estimators that are not post-model selection estimators. Based on these results, subsampling and the m out of n bootstrap are not recommended for obtaining inference based on post-consistent model selection or shrinkage estimators.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65949110625&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65949110625&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.02.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.02.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:65949110625
SN - 0304-4076
VL - 152
SP - 19
EP - 27
JO - Journal of Econometrics
JF - Journal of Econometrics
IS - 1
ER -