Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Index of suspicion: Feeling not believing

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Throughout the U.S., state laws require professionals who work with children to report cases of suspected child abuse to child protection services. Both practically and conceptually, however, significant problems arise from a lack of clarity regarding the threshold that has been set for reporting. Specifically, there is no consensus as to what constitutes reasonable suspicion, and little direction for how mandated reporters should gauge their legal and professional responsibilities when they harbor suspicion. In this paper we outline the context of the problem, discuss the nature and scope of its conceptual underpinnings, and offer recommendations for moving towards a concrete, practical solution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-310
Number of pages34
JournalTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Index of suspicion: Feeling not believing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this