TY - GEN
T1 - INDIVIDUAL AND TEAM COGNITIVE BIASES THAT MAY AFFECT ENGINEERS' ASSESSMENTS AND DECISIONS ON RISK
AU - Gernand, Jeremy M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Cognitive biases play a significant role in decision-making processes within engineering, particularly when it comes to assessing risks associated with technology and making decisions regarding the mitigation of those risks, but while these topics have been explored in a variety of contexts like economics and medicine, current research of these processes in engineering is limited. This paper presents a review of research into engineering decision making and the effects that cognitive biases have on this process. Seventeen experimental studies were reviewed for their insights on these critical questions. While sample sizes are small, and professional engineers have rarely been involved in these experiments, several risk-relevant cognitive biases were confirmed, and some avenues for mitigation of those biases have been explored. These results highlight the critical need for further research in this area, and that more fundamentally sound organization, increasing diversity of research funding and management are needed. These include the investigation of engineering teams, of which only 4 of the 17 included studies have so far explored, with the functioning of teams in the identification and mitigation of risk being current standard engineering practice and critical to the continued safe implementation of technologies to make the world a better place.
AB - Cognitive biases play a significant role in decision-making processes within engineering, particularly when it comes to assessing risks associated with technology and making decisions regarding the mitigation of those risks, but while these topics have been explored in a variety of contexts like economics and medicine, current research of these processes in engineering is limited. This paper presents a review of research into engineering decision making and the effects that cognitive biases have on this process. Seventeen experimental studies were reviewed for their insights on these critical questions. While sample sizes are small, and professional engineers have rarely been involved in these experiments, several risk-relevant cognitive biases were confirmed, and some avenues for mitigation of those biases have been explored. These results highlight the critical need for further research in this area, and that more fundamentally sound organization, increasing diversity of research funding and management are needed. These include the investigation of engineering teams, of which only 4 of the 17 included studies have so far explored, with the functioning of teams in the identification and mitigation of risk being current standard engineering practice and critical to the continued safe implementation of technologies to make the world a better place.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216667093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85216667093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/IMECE2024-144421
DO - 10.1115/IMECE2024-144421
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85216667093
T3 - ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE)
BT - Safety Engineering, Risk and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME 2024 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE 2024
Y2 - 17 November 2024 through 21 November 2024
ER -