Informal institutions, protest, and change in gendered federal systems

Lee Ann Banaszak, S. Laurel Weldon

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations


Federalism seems to play a widely varying role in maintaining or undermining gender hierarchies around the world. In 1869, for example, federalism allowed Wyoming-a new state in the United States-to enfranchise women before this happened at the national level. But in Switzerland, federalism let a recalcitrant canton disenfranchise women until the 1990s-20 years after women achieved the vote on the national level (Banaszak 1996). More generally, federal institutions are associated with widely varying policies on women's rights. Table 1 groups countries according to Lijphart's (1999, Chapter 10) three measures of federalism: a numerical summary measure (column 2), whether the country is centralized or decentralized (column 3), and a dichotomous measure of federal or unitary based on the country's constitution (column 4). No matter which measure is used, gender equality policies vary greatly within each type of system. The wide variation within each category suggests that standard approaches to federalism give us little purchase on gender politics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)262-273
Number of pages12
JournalPolitics and Gender
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 2011

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Informal institutions, protest, and change in gendered federal systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this