Initiation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy results in a fivefold reduction of survival in human septic shock

  • Anand Kumar
  • , Paul Ellis
  • , Yaseen Arabi
  • , Dan Roberts
  • , Bruce Light
  • , Joseph E. Parrillo
  • , Peter Dodek
  • , Gordon Wood
  • , Aseem Kumar
  • , David Simon
  • , Cheryl Peters
  • , Muhammad Ahsan
  • , Dan Chateau
  • , Kenneth E. Wood
  • , Kevin Laupland
  • , Andreas Kramer
  • , Satendra Sharma
  • , Steve Lapinsky
  • , John Marshall
  • , Sandra Dial
  • Ionna Skrobik, Gourang Patel, Dave Gurka, Sergio Zanotti, R. Phillip Dellinger, Dan Feinstein, Jorge Guzman, Nehad Al Shirawi, Ziad Al Memish, John Ronald, Mustafa Suleman, Harleena Gulati, Erica Halmarson, Robert Suppes, Katherine Sullivan, Rob Bohmeier, Sheri Muggaberg, Laura Kravetsky, Amrinder Singh, Lindsey Carter, Kym Wiebe, Laura Kolesar, Jody Richards, Danny Jaswal, Harris Chou, Tom Kosick, Winnie Fu, Charlena Chan, Jia Jia Ren, Mozdeh Bahrainian, Ziaul Haque, Omid Ahmadi Torshizi, Heidi Paulin, Farah Khan, Runjun Kumar, Johanne Harvey, Christina Kim, Jennifer Li, Latoya Campbell, Leo Taiberg, Christa Schorr, Ronny Tchokonte, Catherine Gonzales, Norrie Serrano, Sofia Delgra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

993 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Our goal was to determine the impact of the initiation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy on survival to hospital discharge of patients with septic shock. Methods: The appropriateness of initial antimicrobial therapy, the clinical infection site, and relevant pathogens were retrospectively determined for 5,715 patients with septic shock in three countries. Results: Therapy with appropriate antimicrobial agents was initiated in 80.1% of cases. Overall, the survival rate was 43.7%. There were marked differences in the distribution of comorbidities, clinical infections, and pathogens in patients who received appropriate and inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy (p < 0.0001 for each). The survival rates after appropriate and inappropriate initial therapy were 52.0% and 10.3%, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 9.45; 95% CI, 7.74 to 11.54; p < 0.0001). Similar differences in survival were seen in all major epidemiologic, clinical, and organism subgroups. The decrease in survival with inappropriate initial therapy ranged from 2.3-fold for pneumococcal infection to 17.6-fold with primary bacteremia. After adjustment for acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, comorbidities, hospital site, and other potential risk factors, the inappropriateness of initial antimicrobial therapy remained most highly associated with risk of death (OR, 8.99; 95% CI, 6.60 to 12.23). Conclusions: Inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy for septic shock occurs in about 20% of patients and is associated with a fivefold reduction in survival. Efforts to increase the frequency of the appropriateness of initial antimicrobial therapy must be central to efforts to reduce the mortality of patients with septic shock.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1237-1248
Number of pages12
JournalCHEST
Volume136
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2009

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Initiation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy results in a fivefold reduction of survival in human septic shock'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this