TY - JOUR
T1 - Inmate legal information requests analysis
T2 - Empirical data to inform library purchases in correctional institutions
AU - Kelmor, Kimberli
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Kimberli Kelmor.
PY - 2016/4/2
Y1 - 2016/4/2
N2 - The introduction of legal content to Google Scholar made United States case law and law journal articles accessible to an unprecedented extent. With case law freely available and accurate bibliographic information for articles, could Google Scholar be accurate and complete enough for correctional institutions to forgo purchasing either print publications or fee-based services for these materials? This article empirically assesses whether Google Scholar can reliably answer the questions of inmates in a correctional facility, the Baltimore City Detention Center. As a comparison, the same questions are tested in Westlaw Correctional, a subscription database marketed to correctional institutions.
AB - The introduction of legal content to Google Scholar made United States case law and law journal articles accessible to an unprecedented extent. With case law freely available and accurate bibliographic information for articles, could Google Scholar be accurate and complete enough for correctional institutions to forgo purchasing either print publications or fee-based services for these materials? This article empirically assesses whether Google Scholar can reliably answer the questions of inmates in a correctional facility, the Baltimore City Detention Center. As a comparison, the same questions are tested in Westlaw Correctional, a subscription database marketed to correctional institutions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969256062&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969256062&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0270319X.2016.1177431
DO - 10.1080/0270319X.2016.1177431
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84969256062
SN - 0270-319X
VL - 35
SP - 135
EP - 146
JO - Legal Reference Services Quarterly
JF - Legal Reference Services Quarterly
IS - 2
ER -