TY - JOUR
T1 - inmate society in the era of mass incarceration
AU - Kreager, Derek A.
AU - Kruttschnitt, Candace
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - The origins and contours of inmate social organization were once central research areas that stalled just as incarceration rates dramatically climbed. In this review, we return to seminal works in this area and connect these with six interrelated changes to correctional contexts that accompanied mass incarceration. We argue that changes in prison racial, age, crowding, gender, offense type, and managerial characteristics potentially altered inmate informal organization and have yet to receive adequate criminological attention. We review the few recent studies that document contemporary inmate social life and call for increased researcher-practitioner partnerships that achieve mutual goals and embed criminologists within carceral settings. We suggest that network approaches are particularly useful for building on past qualitative and ethnographic insights to provide replicable results that are also easily conveyed to correctional authorities. As the era of mass incarceration peaks, we assert that the time is ripe for renewed interest in inmate society and its connections to prison stability, rehabilitation, and community reintegration.
AB - The origins and contours of inmate social organization were once central research areas that stalled just as incarceration rates dramatically climbed. In this review, we return to seminal works in this area and connect these with six interrelated changes to correctional contexts that accompanied mass incarceration. We argue that changes in prison racial, age, crowding, gender, offense type, and managerial characteristics potentially altered inmate informal organization and have yet to receive adequate criminological attention. We review the few recent studies that document contemporary inmate social life and call for increased researcher-practitioner partnerships that achieve mutual goals and embed criminologists within carceral settings. We suggest that network approaches are particularly useful for building on past qualitative and ethnographic insights to provide replicable results that are also easily conveyed to correctional authorities. As the era of mass incarceration peaks, we assert that the time is ripe for renewed interest in inmate society and its connections to prison stability, rehabilitation, and community reintegration.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049611016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049611016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092513
DO - 10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092513
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29542738
AN - SCOPUS:85049611016
SN - 2572-4568
VL - 1
SP - 285
EP - 310
JO - Annual Review of Criminology
JF - Annual Review of Criminology
ER -