TY - JOUR
T1 - Interaction between endemic and introduced entomopathogenic nematodes in conventional-till and no-till corn
AU - Millar, Leah C.
AU - Barbercheck, Mary E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding by the USDA’s National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program (Grant No. 9702083) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Fred Gould and David Orr for their comments on the manuscript; Cavell Brownie and Ronald Stinner for help with statistical analyses; George Naderman for providing use of research plots at the Center for Environmental Farming Systems; Ronald Sheffield, Jing Wang, Charles Warrick, Gregory Linville, Carla Hendrix, Joseph Stout, Jeremy Ashton, Grover Garcia, Nabor Mendiza-bel, and Tracy Morris for technical support; and Patricia Stock, Khuong Nguyen, and Enrique Cabanillas for guidance with nematode identifications.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - We used entomopathogenic nematodes as a model to address the issue of environmental impact of introduced biological control agents in the soil. The study was conducted during three field seasons (1997, 1998, and 1999) in no-till and conventional-till corn near Goldsboro, North Carolina. The main objective was to evaluate the interaction of two endemic nematodes, Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, and an introduced exotic nematode, Steinernema riobrave (Texas). Two baiting methods with Galleria mellonella were used to evaluate the nematodes with regard to infected insects and nematode persistence when alone or in cohabitation in the field. We also examined the effects of soil depth on the nematodes' interactions, infectivity, and persistence. The results of the two baiting methods generally agreed with each other. The detection of H. bacteriophora was significantly suppressed in the presence of S. riobrave and slightly more so in conventional-till than in no-till. However, this endemic nematode was not completely displaced 1 and 2 years after the introduction of S. riobrave. Detection of S. carpocapsae and S. riobrave was not affected by the presence of each other, and detection of S. riobrave was not affected by the presence of H. bacteriophora. H. bacteriophora had the strongest tendency to be detected deeper in the soil profile, followed by S. riobrave and then S. carpocapsae. The nematodes' differences in environmental tolerances, differences in tendencies to disperse deeper in the soil profile, and patchy distributions may help explain their coexistence.
AB - We used entomopathogenic nematodes as a model to address the issue of environmental impact of introduced biological control agents in the soil. The study was conducted during three field seasons (1997, 1998, and 1999) in no-till and conventional-till corn near Goldsboro, North Carolina. The main objective was to evaluate the interaction of two endemic nematodes, Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, and an introduced exotic nematode, Steinernema riobrave (Texas). Two baiting methods with Galleria mellonella were used to evaluate the nematodes with regard to infected insects and nematode persistence when alone or in cohabitation in the field. We also examined the effects of soil depth on the nematodes' interactions, infectivity, and persistence. The results of the two baiting methods generally agreed with each other. The detection of H. bacteriophora was significantly suppressed in the presence of S. riobrave and slightly more so in conventional-till than in no-till. However, this endemic nematode was not completely displaced 1 and 2 years after the introduction of S. riobrave. Detection of S. carpocapsae and S. riobrave was not affected by the presence of each other, and detection of S. riobrave was not affected by the presence of H. bacteriophora. H. bacteriophora had the strongest tendency to be detected deeper in the soil profile, followed by S. riobrave and then S. carpocapsae. The nematodes' differences in environmental tolerances, differences in tendencies to disperse deeper in the soil profile, and patchy distributions may help explain their coexistence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035180729&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035180729&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/bcon.2001.0978
DO - 10.1006/bcon.2001.0978
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0035180729
SN - 1049-9644
VL - 22
SP - 235
EP - 245
JO - Biological Control
JF - Biological Control
IS - 3
ER -