TY - JOUR
T1 - Interactions between reader and text
T2 - Contributions of cognitive processes, strategy use, and text cohesion to comprehension of expository science text
AU - Jake Follmer, D.
AU - Sperling, Rayne A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded in part by Psi Chi .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Emerging evidence suggests that characteristics of text demonstrate differential recruitment of specific cognitive processes involved in reading comprehension. The aim of this study was to examine the relations among important reader and text characteristics and their contributions to comprehension of expository science text. Specifically, we examined whether text that varied in referential cohesion required differential use of specific executive functions, metacognitive monitoring of performance, and strategy use among adult readers. The results indicated that shifting, but not updating or inhibition, differentially predicted comprehension of text that was lower in referential cohesion, while updating, but not inhibition or shifting, predicted comprehension of text that was higher in referential cohesion. Metacognitive monitoring and reading strategy use predicted comprehension independent of the level of referential cohesion of text. The findings provide additional evidence for the important and interactive roles of key reader and text characteristics in understanding of expository text, and suggest important areas of future study.
AB - Emerging evidence suggests that characteristics of text demonstrate differential recruitment of specific cognitive processes involved in reading comprehension. The aim of this study was to examine the relations among important reader and text characteristics and their contributions to comprehension of expository science text. Specifically, we examined whether text that varied in referential cohesion required differential use of specific executive functions, metacognitive monitoring of performance, and strategy use among adult readers. The results indicated that shifting, but not updating or inhibition, differentially predicted comprehension of text that was lower in referential cohesion, while updating, but not inhibition or shifting, predicted comprehension of text that was higher in referential cohesion. Metacognitive monitoring and reading strategy use predicted comprehension independent of the level of referential cohesion of text. The findings provide additional evidence for the important and interactive roles of key reader and text characteristics in understanding of expository text, and suggest important areas of future study.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052737518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052737518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.005
DO - 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85052737518
SN - 1041-6080
VL - 67
SP - 177
EP - 187
JO - Learning and Individual Differences
JF - Learning and Individual Differences
ER -