TY - JOUR
T1 - Internet Blogs, Polar Bears, and Climate-Change Denial by Proxy
AU - Harvey, Jeffrey A.
AU - Van Den Berg, Daphne
AU - Ellers, Jacintha
AU - Kampen, Remko
AU - Crowther, Thomas W.
AU - Roessingh, Peter
AU - Verheggen, Bart
AU - Nuijten, Rascha J.M.
AU - Post, Eric
AU - Lewandowsky, Stephan
AU - Stirling, Ian
AU - Balgopal, Meena
AU - Amstrup, Steven C.
AU - Mann, Michael E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Institute of Biological Sciences.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Increasing surface temperatures, Arctic sea-ice loss, and other evidence of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) are acknowledged by every major scientific organization in the world. However, there is a wide gap between this broad scientific consensus and public opinion. Internet blogs have strongly contributed to this consensus gap by fomenting misunderstandings of AGW causes and consequences. Polar bears (Ursus maritimus) have become a "poster species" for AGW, making them a target of those denying AGW evidence. Here, focusing on Arctic sea ice and polar bears, we show that blogs that deny or downplay AGW disregard the overwhelming scientific evidence of Arctic sea-ice loss and polar bear vulnerability. By denying the impacts of AGW on polar bears, bloggers aim to cast doubt on other established ecological consequences of AGW, aggravating the consensus gap. To counter misinformation and reduce this gap, scientists should directly engage the public in the media and blogosphere.
AB - Increasing surface temperatures, Arctic sea-ice loss, and other evidence of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) are acknowledged by every major scientific organization in the world. However, there is a wide gap between this broad scientific consensus and public opinion. Internet blogs have strongly contributed to this consensus gap by fomenting misunderstandings of AGW causes and consequences. Polar bears (Ursus maritimus) have become a "poster species" for AGW, making them a target of those denying AGW evidence. Here, focusing on Arctic sea ice and polar bears, we show that blogs that deny or downplay AGW disregard the overwhelming scientific evidence of Arctic sea-ice loss and polar bear vulnerability. By denying the impacts of AGW on polar bears, bloggers aim to cast doubt on other established ecological consequences of AGW, aggravating the consensus gap. To counter misinformation and reduce this gap, scientists should directly engage the public in the media and blogosphere.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045520227&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045520227&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/biosci/bix133
DO - 10.1093/biosci/bix133
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29662248
AN - SCOPUS:85045520227
SN - 0006-3568
VL - 68
SP - 281
EP - 287
JO - BioScience
JF - BioScience
IS - 4
ER -