Abstract
In the context of 'capacity design' and the requirements of failure mode control, the accurate and realistic interpretation of test results assumes a role of utmost importance. Moreover, the separation of overall action-deformation characteristics into components reflecting the true response mechanism (such as shear and flexure in reinforced concrete) enables preferential design in favor of a more ductile mechanism to another. In this context, the paper highlights common pitfalls in the control and interpretation of tests on mixed-mode (flexure/shear) reinforced concrete members; such misinterpretations were identified in recent publications and may lead to erroneous conclusions. Means of minimizing testing errors and possible remedial action are also briefly outlined.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 642-645 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | ACI Materials Journal |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| State | Published - Nov 1993 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Building and Construction
- General Materials Science