Abstract
This article explores the image of interspecies reproduction, arguably the most disturbing of the range of contemporary images of reproductive technology, as both a metaphor of some historical standing and as a new, and troubling, medical/scientific capability. Moving from the 1994 report of the Human Embryo Research Panel of the NIH, also known as the Muller Panel, through a range of sites - natural history, popular science writing, social critique, fiction, feminist theory and science studies - the article explores the context in which our current scientific perspective on interspecies reproduction is constructed. The study demonstrates the value of contextualizing - both in terms of history and literature - even the most seemingly transparent scientific or medical intervention, in order to achieve the fullest understanding of its implications. A concluding consideration of the philosophical/theoretical construction of interspecies reproduction in the present (postmodern) moment explores its implications for our understanding of the feminist critique of science.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 360-381 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Cultural Studies |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 1998 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Cultural Studies
- Anthropology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Interspecies reproduction: Xenogenic desire and the feminist implications of hybrids'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver