TY - JOUR
T1 - Intraoperative Placement of the Nasoenteric Feeding Tube
T2 - A Practical Alternative?
AU - Jensen, Gordon L.
AU - Sporay, George
AU - Whitmire, Susan
AU - Taraszewski, Robert
AU - Reed, Mary J.
PY - 1995/5
Y1 - 1995/5
N2 - Background: The provision of early postoperative enteral feeding may be enhanced by the placement of enteral feeding access during celiotomy, but surgeons are often reluctant to pursue this option because of the extra effort required. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of our 2-year experience with 60 sequential intraoperative nasoenteric feeding-tube placements and included data on demographics, diagnosis, surgery, type of feeding tube, formula, tolerance, and complications. Our surgeons placed intraoperative nasoenteric feeding tubes at their discretion in a variety of subjects who were undergoing elective or urgent celiotomies. Results: The surgeries largely involved the upper gastrointestinal tract, and feeding-tube placements were readily accomplished. The majority of patients received enteral feedings within 3 postoperative days and achieved feeding rates of 50 mL/h or greater. The average duration of feeding-tube use was 1 week, accounting for 399 feeding days overall. There were no serious complications attributable to feeding-tube placement or use, but inadvertent tube removal by patients or staff was a limitation. Conclusions: Intraoperative placement of the nasoenteric feeding tube may be a reasonable option for treating the surgical patient at nutritional risk who faces a limited course of impaired oral intake postoperatively. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 19:244-247, 1995).
AB - Background: The provision of early postoperative enteral feeding may be enhanced by the placement of enteral feeding access during celiotomy, but surgeons are often reluctant to pursue this option because of the extra effort required. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of our 2-year experience with 60 sequential intraoperative nasoenteric feeding-tube placements and included data on demographics, diagnosis, surgery, type of feeding tube, formula, tolerance, and complications. Our surgeons placed intraoperative nasoenteric feeding tubes at their discretion in a variety of subjects who were undergoing elective or urgent celiotomies. Results: The surgeries largely involved the upper gastrointestinal tract, and feeding-tube placements were readily accomplished. The majority of patients received enteral feedings within 3 postoperative days and achieved feeding rates of 50 mL/h or greater. The average duration of feeding-tube use was 1 week, accounting for 399 feeding days overall. There were no serious complications attributable to feeding-tube placement or use, but inadvertent tube removal by patients or staff was a limitation. Conclusions: Intraoperative placement of the nasoenteric feeding tube may be a reasonable option for treating the surgical patient at nutritional risk who faces a limited course of impaired oral intake postoperatively. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 19:244-247, 1995).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029003613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029003613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0148607195019003244
DO - 10.1177/0148607195019003244
M3 - Article
C2 - 8551656
AN - SCOPUS:0029003613
SN - 0148-6071
VL - 19
SP - 244
EP - 247
JO - Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
JF - Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
IS - 3
ER -