TY - JOUR
T1 - Intraosseous Emergency Access by Physicians Wearing Full Protective Gear
AU - Ben-Abraham, Ron
AU - Gur, Ilan
AU - Vater, Youri
AU - Weinbroum, Avi A.
PY - 2003/12
Y1 - 2003/12
N2 - Objectives: To assess prospectively and randomly the feasibility, speed, and success rate of establishing an intraosseous access using the Bone Injection Gun (BIG) while wearing antichemical outfits. Methods: Attempts to introduce intraosseous injection with or without a full protective gear (antichemical body suit, face mask, and butyl gloves) were performed using a turkey bone model. Time to proper placement was measured. Results: The average time to successfully insert the BIG's needle while wearing a protective gear was 32 ± 3 seconds compared with 22 ± 2 seconds (p < 0.05) without the outfit. Success rate was greater than or equal to 80%. When failure occurred, a second attempt always proved successful. Conclusions: The intraosseous insertion of the BIG's needle is rapid and easy but requires 50% more time when wearing protective gear than without it. Its use during emergent treatment of toxic mass casualty is of potential benefit and needs further investigation.
AB - Objectives: To assess prospectively and randomly the feasibility, speed, and success rate of establishing an intraosseous access using the Bone Injection Gun (BIG) while wearing antichemical outfits. Methods: Attempts to introduce intraosseous injection with or without a full protective gear (antichemical body suit, face mask, and butyl gloves) were performed using a turkey bone model. Time to proper placement was measured. Results: The average time to successfully insert the BIG's needle while wearing a protective gear was 32 ± 3 seconds compared with 22 ± 2 seconds (p < 0.05) without the outfit. Success rate was greater than or equal to 80%. When failure occurred, a second attempt always proved successful. Conclusions: The intraosseous insertion of the BIG's needle is rapid and easy but requires 50% more time when wearing protective gear than without it. Its use during emergent treatment of toxic mass casualty is of potential benefit and needs further investigation.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0347383751
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347383751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1197/S1069-6563(03)00546-3
DO - 10.1197/S1069-6563(03)00546-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 14644797
AN - SCOPUS:0347383751
SN - 1069-6563
VL - 10
SP - 1407
EP - 1410
JO - Academic Emergency Medicine
JF - Academic Emergency Medicine
IS - 12
ER -