TY - JOUR
T1 - Intrarater and interrater reliability of a manual technique to assess anterior humeral head translation of the glenohumeral joint
AU - Ellenbecker, Todd S.
AU - Bailie, David S.
AU - Mattalino, Angelo J.
AU - Carfagno, David G.
AU - Wolff, Michael W.
AU - Brown, Scott W.
AU - Kulikowich, Jonna M.
PY - 2002/10
Y1 - 2002/10
N2 - The purpose of this study was to determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of a manual anterior humeral head translation test. Fifteen subjects were positioned lying in a supine position with their identity shielded from examiners. A standard manual anterior humeral head translation test was performed and repeated with the glenohumeral joint in 90° of elevation in the scapular plane, with use of the grading method proposed by Altchek and Dines in 1993. Reliability was assessed with the coefficient of agreement and κ statistic. Intrarater reliability was 81.4% comparing grade I and II translation. This decreased to 54% when examiners distinguished between grades I, I+, II, and II+. Interrater reliability for the same comparisons was 70.4%, decreasing to 37.3%.On the basis of these data, the technique of manually assessing anterior humeral head translation studied has poor overall interrater reliability and only fair intrarater reliability. The test-retest accuracy of humeral head translation is enhanced when examiners only determine the relationship of the humeral head relative to the glenoid rim.
AB - The purpose of this study was to determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of a manual anterior humeral head translation test. Fifteen subjects were positioned lying in a supine position with their identity shielded from examiners. A standard manual anterior humeral head translation test was performed and repeated with the glenohumeral joint in 90° of elevation in the scapular plane, with use of the grading method proposed by Altchek and Dines in 1993. Reliability was assessed with the coefficient of agreement and κ statistic. Intrarater reliability was 81.4% comparing grade I and II translation. This decreased to 54% when examiners distinguished between grades I, I+, II, and II+. Interrater reliability for the same comparisons was 70.4%, decreasing to 37.3%.On the basis of these data, the technique of manually assessing anterior humeral head translation studied has poor overall interrater reliability and only fair intrarater reliability. The test-retest accuracy of humeral head translation is enhanced when examiners only determine the relationship of the humeral head relative to the glenoid rim.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036717134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036717134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1067/mse.2002.126616
DO - 10.1067/mse.2002.126616
M3 - Article
C2 - 12378166
AN - SCOPUS:0036717134
SN - 1058-2746
VL - 11
SP - 470
EP - 475
JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
IS - 5
ER -