TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigating optimization as a practice in a middle school engineering class (work in progress)
AU - Johnson, Matthew M.
AU - Cesare, Amber
AU - Knowles, Gabe
AU - Wood, Taylor S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Special thanks to the participating teacher and his students for participation in this study. This work is supported in part by National Science Foundation under Grant Number 1351591. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Funding Information:
The teacher attended a one-day workshop in May of 2018 about this topic sponsored by a National Science Foundation grant (# CMI-1351591). Teachers in this workshop engaged in the same activity described above. Mr. Pfeuffer (pseudonym) is certified in technology education and has fifteen years of teaching experience, fourteen of those years in his current placement. He was the first teacher to express interest in implementing the lesson in his class, which is why this was chosen as the site for a pilot study.
Publisher Copyright:
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
PY - 2019/6/15
Y1 - 2019/6/15
N2 - This work in progress paper describes a pilot study intended to better understand the ways students and teachers in a middle school engineering class iteratively optimize a multi-objective problem. Recent reforms in STEM education have placed an emphasis on engaging K-12 students in the knowledge-building practices of professionals as a way to teach and apply content, but so far few have looked closely at classrooms engaged in these practices. An ethnographic perspective was used to closely observe the talk and actions of three groups of eighth-grade students from a low-income rural school district and their teacher as they attempted to minimize cost, mass, and deflection of a truss cantilever using two computer-based tools. Methods of interactional ethnography were used to analyze the ways in which they took risks to test the boundaries of the structure and balanced tradeoffs while still producing a physical prototype that could hold a 1.5 kg mass. Preliminary results suggest that when supported by their teacher, students became increasingly more comfortable with taking risks and pushing the limits of the structure in low-stakes situations. Additionally, we found that students were able to use a variety of approaches to strategically remove structural members, including applying scientific knowledge, and were able to appropriately compare multiple models to inform the design of their physical prototype. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate optimization explicitly as a practice in a precollege context, and it contributes to the knowledge base of our understanding of how students and teachers do engineering and how engineering educators can promote improved curriculum and pedagogy in this area.
AB - This work in progress paper describes a pilot study intended to better understand the ways students and teachers in a middle school engineering class iteratively optimize a multi-objective problem. Recent reforms in STEM education have placed an emphasis on engaging K-12 students in the knowledge-building practices of professionals as a way to teach and apply content, but so far few have looked closely at classrooms engaged in these practices. An ethnographic perspective was used to closely observe the talk and actions of three groups of eighth-grade students from a low-income rural school district and their teacher as they attempted to minimize cost, mass, and deflection of a truss cantilever using two computer-based tools. Methods of interactional ethnography were used to analyze the ways in which they took risks to test the boundaries of the structure and balanced tradeoffs while still producing a physical prototype that could hold a 1.5 kg mass. Preliminary results suggest that when supported by their teacher, students became increasingly more comfortable with taking risks and pushing the limits of the structure in low-stakes situations. Additionally, we found that students were able to use a variety of approaches to strategically remove structural members, including applying scientific knowledge, and were able to appropriately compare multiple models to inform the design of their physical prototype. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate optimization explicitly as a practice in a precollege context, and it contributes to the knowledge base of our understanding of how students and teachers do engineering and how engineering educators can promote improved curriculum and pedagogy in this area.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078796108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078796108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85078796108
SN - 2153-5965
JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
T2 - 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Charged Up for the Next 125 Years, ASEE 2019
Y2 - 15 June 2019 through 19 June 2019
ER -