TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigating preferences for mosquito-control technologies in Mozambique with latent class analysis
AU - Smith, Rachel A.
AU - Barclay, Victoria C.
AU - Findeis, Jill L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by funding received from the McKnight Foundation Collaborative Crop Research Program (CCRP, Eastern Africa CoP), pilot funding provided by the Clinical and Translational Science Institute at The Pennsylvania State University, and Award Number P50-DA010075 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the McKnight Foundation, the National Institute on Drug Abuse or the National Institutes of Health. The authors thank Danielle Catona, Caitlin Mingey, Luis Sevilla, and Maria Da Luz Qienhentos for their efforts on this project, and Matthew Thomas and Andrew Read for their insights on the ideas presented herein. Most importantly, we are grateful to the leaders and citizens of Mozambique, for sharing their information and insights with us.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Background: It is common practice to seek the opinions of future end-users during the development of innovations. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate latent classes of users in Mozambique based on their preferences for mosquito-control technology attributes and covariates of these classes, as well as to explore which current technologies meet these preferences. Methods. Surveys were administered in five rural villages in Mozambique. The data were analysed with latent class analysis. Results: This study showed that users' preferences for malaria technologies varied, and people could be categorized into four latent classes based on shared preferences. The largest class, constituting almost half of the respondents, would not avoid a mosquito-control technology because of its cost, heat, odour, potential to make other health issues worse, ease of keeping clean, or inadequate mosquito control. The other three groups are characterized by the attributes which would make them avoid a technology; these groups are labelled as the bites class, by-products class, and multiple-concerns class. Statistically significant covariates included literacy, self-efficacy, willingness to try new technologies, and perceived seriousness of malaria for the household. Conclusions: To become widely diffused, best practices suggest that end-users should be included in product development to ensure that preferred attributes or traits are considered. This study demonstrates that end-user preferences can be very different and that one malaria control technology will not satisfy everyone.
AB - Background: It is common practice to seek the opinions of future end-users during the development of innovations. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate latent classes of users in Mozambique based on their preferences for mosquito-control technology attributes and covariates of these classes, as well as to explore which current technologies meet these preferences. Methods. Surveys were administered in five rural villages in Mozambique. The data were analysed with latent class analysis. Results: This study showed that users' preferences for malaria technologies varied, and people could be categorized into four latent classes based on shared preferences. The largest class, constituting almost half of the respondents, would not avoid a mosquito-control technology because of its cost, heat, odour, potential to make other health issues worse, ease of keeping clean, or inadequate mosquito control. The other three groups are characterized by the attributes which would make them avoid a technology; these groups are labelled as the bites class, by-products class, and multiple-concerns class. Statistically significant covariates included literacy, self-efficacy, willingness to try new technologies, and perceived seriousness of malaria for the household. Conclusions: To become widely diffused, best practices suggest that end-users should be included in product development to ensure that preferred attributes or traits are considered. This study demonstrates that end-user preferences can be very different and that one malaria control technology will not satisfy everyone.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960564905&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960564905&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1475-2875-10-200
DO - 10.1186/1475-2875-10-200
M3 - Article
C2 - 21777446
AN - SCOPUS:79960564905
SN - 1475-2875
VL - 10
JO - Malaria journal
JF - Malaria journal
M1 - 200
ER -