TY - GEN
T1 - INVESTIGATING THE TIMING OF DFAM INTERVENTIONS ON STUDENTS’ EARLY-STAGE DESIGNS FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
AU - Pearl, Seth
AU - Meisel, Nicholas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by ASME.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Additive manufacturing (AM) has revolutionized the manufacturing workforce. AM’s layer-by-layer approach to producing end-use parts enables designers to reduce material costs and create designs inconceivable with traditional processes. AM’s benefits have necessitated efforts to educate students on how to improve their designs for AM. Previous studies have explored design for AM (DfAM) interventions to address this need by providing students with a broad set of DfAM heuristics prior to participating in design challenges. While these studies have enhanced DfAM education, there are unanswered questions regarding when DfAM heuristics should be provided to students. Refining DfAM interventions with specific heuristics outlining the advantages (Opportunistic DfAM or O-DfAM) and limitations (Restrictive DfAM or R-DfAM) of AM can reveal how students apply DfAM heuristics to their designs based on intervention timing. This current work investigates early-stage designs for AM when the intervention timing is varied as students work through the engineering design process. It was found that students significantly applied certain O-DfAM heuristics when the intervention took place during converging, while certain R-DfAM heuristics were significantly applied when the intervention took place during diverging. These findings reveal the significance of how intervention can improve students’ early-stage designs for AM.
AB - Additive manufacturing (AM) has revolutionized the manufacturing workforce. AM’s layer-by-layer approach to producing end-use parts enables designers to reduce material costs and create designs inconceivable with traditional processes. AM’s benefits have necessitated efforts to educate students on how to improve their designs for AM. Previous studies have explored design for AM (DfAM) interventions to address this need by providing students with a broad set of DfAM heuristics prior to participating in design challenges. While these studies have enhanced DfAM education, there are unanswered questions regarding when DfAM heuristics should be provided to students. Refining DfAM interventions with specific heuristics outlining the advantages (Opportunistic DfAM or O-DfAM) and limitations (Restrictive DfAM or R-DfAM) of AM can reveal how students apply DfAM heuristics to their designs based on intervention timing. This current work investigates early-stage designs for AM when the intervention timing is varied as students work through the engineering design process. It was found that students significantly applied certain O-DfAM heuristics when the intervention took place during converging, while certain R-DfAM heuristics were significantly applied when the intervention took place during diverging. These findings reveal the significance of how intervention can improve students’ early-stage designs for AM.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105024077381
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105024077381#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1115/DETC2025-168881
DO - 10.1115/DETC2025-168881
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105024077381
T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
BT - 22nd International Conference on Design Education (DEC); 30th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC); 37th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM)
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME 2025 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC-CIE 2025
Y2 - 17 August 2025 through 20 August 2025
ER -