Abstract
It is important to get away from the prevailing notion that off‐the‐job training is always more efficient and effective than on‐the‐job training (OJT). Jan de Jong has done an admirable job of drawing attention to this important issue. I would like to provide support for several of de Jong's key points and raise issues with others. My aim is to enlarge the discussion beyond issues in de Jong's article and to frame questions that I—as a practitioner who has long grappled firsthand with this subject—feel are central to the continuing evolution of OJT and on‐the‐job learning (OJL) in the workplace.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 319-323 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Human Resource Development Quarterly |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1991 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Invited reaction: Thoughts about on‐the‐job training and on‐the‐job learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver