Abstract
Formal diversion programs are increasingly popular options for offenders with mental illness. Diversion is recommended, and often assumed, to be swift in that eligible persons should be quickly identified and enrolled. In this study, the authors examine the length from initial arrest to enrollment into mental health court and compare it to time from arrest to disposition for offenders with and without mental illness traditionally processed. The authors, using medians as the metric and limiting the period to 1 year, found time to mental health court was 70 days, whereas traditional processing for offenders with and without known mental illness was 37 and 76 days, respectively. The authors also found detention status during this period to have a large effect on processing time.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 420-433 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Criminal Justice and Behavior |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- General Psychology
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is Diversion Swift? Comparing Mental Health Court and Traditional Criminal Justice Processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver