TY - JOUR
T1 - Is it beneficial to involve a family member? A meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for chronic illness
AU - Martire, Lynn M.
AU - Lustig, Amy P.
AU - Schulz, Richard
AU - Miller, Gregory E.
AU - Helgeson, Vicki S.
PY - 2004/11
Y1 - 2004/11
N2 - Links between chronic illness and family relationships have led to psychosocial interventions targeted at the patient's closest family member or both patient and family member. The authors conducted a meta-analytic review of randomized studies comparing these interventions with usual medical care (k = 70), focusing on patient outcomes (depression, anxiety, relationship satisfaction, disability, and mortality) and family member outcomes (depression, anxiety, relationship satisfaction, and caregiving burden). Among patients, interventions had positive effects on depression when the spouse was included and, in some cases, on mortality. Among family members, positive effects were found for caregiving burden, depression, and anxiety; these effects were strongest for nondementing illnesses and for interventions that targeted only the family member and that addressed relationship issues. Although statistically significant aggregate effects were found, they were generally small in magnitude. These findings provide guidance in developing future interventions in this area.
AB - Links between chronic illness and family relationships have led to psychosocial interventions targeted at the patient's closest family member or both patient and family member. The authors conducted a meta-analytic review of randomized studies comparing these interventions with usual medical care (k = 70), focusing on patient outcomes (depression, anxiety, relationship satisfaction, disability, and mortality) and family member outcomes (depression, anxiety, relationship satisfaction, and caregiving burden). Among patients, interventions had positive effects on depression when the spouse was included and, in some cases, on mortality. Among family members, positive effects were found for caregiving burden, depression, and anxiety; these effects were strongest for nondementing illnesses and for interventions that targeted only the family member and that addressed relationship issues. Although statistically significant aggregate effects were found, they were generally small in magnitude. These findings provide guidance in developing future interventions in this area.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7444252761&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7444252761&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/0278-6133.23.6.599
DO - 10.1037/0278-6133.23.6.599
M3 - Review article
C2 - 15546228
AN - SCOPUS:7444252761
SN - 0278-6133
VL - 23
SP - 599
EP - 611
JO - Health Psychology
JF - Health Psychology
IS - 6
ER -