Is reliability obsolete? A commentary on "are simple gain scores obsolete?"

Linda M. Collins

doi:10.1177/014662169602000308

Is reliability obsolete? A commentary on "are simple gain scores obsolete?"

Linda M. Collins

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

53 Scopus citations

Abstract

Williams & Zimmerman (1996) provided much-needed clarification on the reliability of gain scores. This commentary translates these ideas into recognizable patterns of change that tend to produce reliable or unreliable gain scores. It also questions the relevance of the traditional idea of reliability to the measurement of change.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	289-292
Number of pages	4
Journal	Applied Psychological Measurement
Volume	20
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169602000308
State	Published - Sep 1996

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Psychology (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1177/014662169602000308

Cite this

@article{3eb7c69a29344e09b5c2915afe2d028e,

title = "Is reliability obsolete? A commentary on {"}are simple gain scores obsolete?{"}",

abstract = "Williams & Zimmerman (1996) provided much-needed clarification on the reliability of gain scores. This commentary translates these ideas into recognizable patterns of change that tend to produce reliable or unreliable gain scores. It also questions the relevance of the traditional idea of reliability to the measurement of change.",

author = "Collins, {Linda M.}",

year = "1996",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1177/014662169602000308",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "20",

pages = "289--292",

journal = "Applied Psychological Measurement",

issn = "0146-6216",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is reliability obsolete? A commentary on "are simple gain scores obsolete?"

AU - Collins, Linda M.

PY - 1996/9

Y1 - 1996/9

N2 - Williams & Zimmerman (1996) provided much-needed clarification on the reliability of gain scores. This commentary translates these ideas into recognizable patterns of change that tend to produce reliable or unreliable gain scores. It also questions the relevance of the traditional idea of reliability to the measurement of change.

AB - Williams & Zimmerman (1996) provided much-needed clarification on the reliability of gain scores. This commentary translates these ideas into recognizable patterns of change that tend to produce reliable or unreliable gain scores. It also questions the relevance of the traditional idea of reliability to the measurement of change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030366347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030366347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/014662169602000308

DO - 10.1177/014662169602000308

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030366347

SN - 0146-6216

VL - 20

SP - 289

EP - 292

JO - Applied Psychological Measurement

JF - Applied Psychological Measurement

IS - 3

ER -

Is reliability obsolete? A commentary on "are simple gain scores obsolete?"

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this