TY - JOUR
T1 - Is there a place for undergraduate and graduate students in the systematic review process?
AU - Wissinger, Christina L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Medical Library Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - Systematic reviews are a well-established and well-honed research methodology in the medical and health sciences fields. As the popularity of systematic reviews has increased, disciplines outside the sciences have started publishing them. This increase in familiarity has begun to trickle down from practitioners and faculty to graduate students and recently undergraduates. The amount of work and rigor that goes into producing a quality systematic review may make these types of research projects seem unattainable for undergraduate or graduate students, but is this an accurate assumption? This commentary discusses whether there is a place for undergraduate and graduate students in the systematic review process. It explains the possible benefits of having undergraduate and graduate students engage in systematic reviews and concludes with ideas for creating basic education or training opportunities for researchers and students who are new to the systematic review process.
AB - Systematic reviews are a well-established and well-honed research methodology in the medical and health sciences fields. As the popularity of systematic reviews has increased, disciplines outside the sciences have started publishing them. This increase in familiarity has begun to trickle down from practitioners and faculty to graduate students and recently undergraduates. The amount of work and rigor that goes into producing a quality systematic review may make these types of research projects seem unattainable for undergraduate or graduate students, but is this an accurate assumption? This commentary discusses whether there is a place for undergraduate and graduate students in the systematic review process. It explains the possible benefits of having undergraduate and graduate students engage in systematic reviews and concludes with ideas for creating basic education or training opportunities for researchers and students who are new to the systematic review process.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045339558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045339558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5195/jmla.2018.387
DO - 10.5195/jmla.2018.387
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 29632448
AN - SCOPUS:85045339558
SN - 1536-5050
VL - 106
SP - 248
EP - 250
JO - Journal of the Medical Library Association
JF - Journal of the Medical Library Association
IS - 2
ER -