TY - JOUR
T1 - Isolation and Identification of the Follicular Microbiome
T2 - Implications for Acne Research
AU - Hall, Jacob B.
AU - Cong, Zhaoyuan
AU - Imamura-Kawasawa, Yuka
AU - Kidd, Brian A.
AU - Dudley, Joel T.
AU - Thiboutot, Diane M.
AU - Nelson, Amanda M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Our understanding of the microbiome and the role of Propionibacterium acnes in skin homeostasis and acne pathogenesis is evolving. Multiple methods for sampling and identifying the skin's microbiome exist, and understanding the differences between the abilities of various methods to characterize the microbial landscape is warranted. This study compared the microbial diversity of samples obtained from the cheeks of 20 volunteers, collected by surface swab, pore strips, and cyanoacrylate glue follicular biopsy, all sequenced with 16S rRNA sequencing (V1–V3) and whole-genome metagenomic sequencing. The sequencing method of choice influenced the detection of microbial profiles as whole-genome sequencing captured more species diversity, including viruses, compared with 16S sequencing. The relative abundance of bacterial or fungal species and overall diversity did not differ between sampling methods. However, the viral composition of the skin's surface is unique compared with the follicle, suggesting distinct viral niches within the skin. P. acnes bacteria, ribotypes, and bacteriophages were identified equally by all sampling methods indicating that the sampling method, whether for the skin's surface or follicle, does not impact P. acnes-related characterization and that all may be equally useful for acne-related research studies.
AB - Our understanding of the microbiome and the role of Propionibacterium acnes in skin homeostasis and acne pathogenesis is evolving. Multiple methods for sampling and identifying the skin's microbiome exist, and understanding the differences between the abilities of various methods to characterize the microbial landscape is warranted. This study compared the microbial diversity of samples obtained from the cheeks of 20 volunteers, collected by surface swab, pore strips, and cyanoacrylate glue follicular biopsy, all sequenced with 16S rRNA sequencing (V1–V3) and whole-genome metagenomic sequencing. The sequencing method of choice influenced the detection of microbial profiles as whole-genome sequencing captured more species diversity, including viruses, compared with 16S sequencing. The relative abundance of bacterial or fungal species and overall diversity did not differ between sampling methods. However, the viral composition of the skin's surface is unique compared with the follicle, suggesting distinct viral niches within the skin. P. acnes bacteria, ribotypes, and bacteriophages were identified equally by all sampling methods indicating that the sampling method, whether for the skin's surface or follicle, does not impact P. acnes-related characterization and that all may be equally useful for acne-related research studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047442461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047442461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jid.2018.02.038
DO - 10.1016/j.jid.2018.02.038
M3 - Article
C2 - 29548797
AN - SCOPUS:85047442461
SN - 0022-202X
VL - 138
SP - 2033
EP - 2040
JO - Journal of Investigative Dermatology
JF - Journal of Investigative Dermatology
IS - 9
ER -