It is standard practice, but is it really best practice or clinical biocreep?

Ian C. Gilchrist

doi:10.1002/ccd.22775

It is standard practice, but is it really best practice or clinical biocreep?

Ian C. Gilchrist

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	525-526
Number of pages	2
Journal	Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume	76
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22775
State	Published - Oct 1 2010

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1002/ccd.22775

Cite this

@article{6c7ffdbf88594b59b79e2ba9f7c02dff,

title = "It is standard practice, but is it really best practice or clinical biocreep?",

author = "Gilchrist, {Ian C.}",

year = "2010",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/ccd.22775",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "76",

pages = "525--526",

journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",

issn = "1522-1946",