TY - JOUR
T1 - Job transfers and incentives in complex organizations
T2 - Thwarting the ratchet effect
AU - Ickes, Barry W.
AU - Samuelson, Larry
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful for the helpful comments and suggestions of Eric W. Bond, the Editorial Board, and two anonymous referees. Financial support from the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
Publisher Copyright:
© 1987 Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 1987
Y1 - 1987
N2 - Many complex organizations, such as planned Soviet enterprises and the U.S. military, routinely transfer employees between jobs. Since this sacrifices job-specific human capital, the practice is puzzling. This article shows that regular job transfers may be part of an optimal incentive scheme in organizations plagued by the ratchet effect. The ratchet effect arises when an employer is uncertain as to the productivity of the various positions or jobs within an organization. Workers in highly productive jobs then have an incentive to disguise the productivity of their jobs by expending low effort and producing low output. This avoids having the employer construct more demanding remuneration schemes once the high productivity of a job becomes known. Job transfers break the link between current performance and future incentive schemes, and hence remove the incentive-stifling implications of the ratchet effect. This article examines the tradeoff between providing more effective incentives via job transfers and the accompanying sacrifice of job-specific human capital, establishes conditions under which job transfers are optimal, and develops comparative static results.
AB - Many complex organizations, such as planned Soviet enterprises and the U.S. military, routinely transfer employees between jobs. Since this sacrifices job-specific human capital, the practice is puzzling. This article shows that regular job transfers may be part of an optimal incentive scheme in organizations plagued by the ratchet effect. The ratchet effect arises when an employer is uncertain as to the productivity of the various positions or jobs within an organization. Workers in highly productive jobs then have an incentive to disguise the productivity of their jobs by expending low effort and producing low output. This avoids having the employer construct more demanding remuneration schemes once the high productivity of a job becomes known. Job transfers break the link between current performance and future incentive schemes, and hence remove the incentive-stifling implications of the ratchet effect. This article examines the tradeoff between providing more effective incentives via job transfers and the accompanying sacrifice of job-specific human capital, establishes conditions under which job transfers are optimal, and develops comparative static results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000574383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000574383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2307/2555552
DO - 10.2307/2555552
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0000574383
SN - 0741-6261
VL - 18
SP - 275
EP - 286
JO - RAND Journal of Economics
JF - RAND Journal of Economics
IS - 2
ER -