TY - JOUR
T1 - Joint Optimization of Signal Phasing and Timing and Vehicle Speed Guidance in a Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Environment
AU - Liang, Xiao (Joyce)
AU - Guler, S. Ilgin
AU - Gayah, Vikash V.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank B. Massa and G. Sarà for helpful discussions at various stages in the preparation of the manuscript, M. Di Vittorio, G. Rossi and G. Sarà for allowing use their field equipment, and the Sarà family for providing accommodation in the field. We also thank M. Di Vittorio for invaluable assistance in the field, and the apiculturist S. Falcone for providing the bee hive and an estimate of worker depletion in that hive after our experiment. We thank S.G. Sealy, D.W. Mock, G.A. Sonerud, and two anonymous referees whose comments improved earlier drafts of the manuscript. Funding for this research was provided by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grants to J.F. Hare and S.G. Sealy, while D. Campobello was supported by a Faculty of Graduate Studies Scholarship at the University of Manitoba.
Publisher Copyright:
© National Academy of Sciences: Transportation Research Board 2019.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - A joint traffic signal optimization algorithm is proposed which utilizes connected vehicle (CV) information to identify optimum signal timing and phasing plans while also providing speed guidance to individual vehicles to minimize total number of stopping maneuvers. The contribution of this paper is provision of speed guidance to both autonomous (AVs) and human-driven speed guidance-enabled vehicles (SGVs), recognizing that the latter may not fully comply with the speed guidance and would require some delay (i.e., reaction time) to implement it. The control algorithm is triggered at regular discrete time intervals during which CV information is used to identify the presence of non-CVs and incorporate them into signal timing decision-making. Optimal speeds are determined for any AVs or SGVs so that they can travel through the intersection at the expected departure time without stopping, considering both acceleration/deceleration and human reaction times. Simulation tests are performed under different CV, AV, and SGV penetration rates, while explicitly modeling the potential human errors and varying acceptance levels. The results suggest that average delay and number of stops decrease with higher CV penetration rate. Furthermore, the number of stops decreases as the ratio of both AVs and SGVs increases. While AVs are about 10% more efficient than SGVs, human-driven vehicles still provide a benefit even when they do not fully comply with speed guidance information. Sensitivity tests suggest that operation is not significantly affected by the range of human driver errors in speed compliance or range of reaction times.
AB - A joint traffic signal optimization algorithm is proposed which utilizes connected vehicle (CV) information to identify optimum signal timing and phasing plans while also providing speed guidance to individual vehicles to minimize total number of stopping maneuvers. The contribution of this paper is provision of speed guidance to both autonomous (AVs) and human-driven speed guidance-enabled vehicles (SGVs), recognizing that the latter may not fully comply with the speed guidance and would require some delay (i.e., reaction time) to implement it. The control algorithm is triggered at regular discrete time intervals during which CV information is used to identify the presence of non-CVs and incorporate them into signal timing decision-making. Optimal speeds are determined for any AVs or SGVs so that they can travel through the intersection at the expected departure time without stopping, considering both acceleration/deceleration and human reaction times. Simulation tests are performed under different CV, AV, and SGV penetration rates, while explicitly modeling the potential human errors and varying acceptance levels. The results suggest that average delay and number of stops decrease with higher CV penetration rate. Furthermore, the number of stops decreases as the ratio of both AVs and SGVs increases. While AVs are about 10% more efficient than SGVs, human-driven vehicles still provide a benefit even when they do not fully comply with speed guidance information. Sensitivity tests suggest that operation is not significantly affected by the range of human driver errors in speed compliance or range of reaction times.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064575186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064575186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0361198119841285
DO - 10.1177/0361198119841285
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85064575186
SN - 0361-1981
VL - 2673
SP - 70
EP - 83
JO - Transportation Research Record
JF - Transportation Research Record
IS - 4
ER -