Judicial Opinion 131

  • David R. Arahal
  • , Carolee T. Bull
  • , Henrik Christensen
  • , Christopher Dunlap
  • , Maria Del Carmen Montero-Calasanz
  • , Charles T. Parker
  • , Peter Vandamme
  • , Antonio Ventosa
  • , Stefano Ventura
  • , Peter Young
  • , Markus Göker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Opinion 131 addresses a Request for an Opinion asking the Judicial Commission to conserve the genus name Proteus Hauser 1885 (Approved Lists 1980) over its earlier homonym, the protozoan genus name Proteus Müller 1786. The Judicial Commission agrees that the later homonym is illegitimate and that the replacement of the prokaryotic name Proteus would be undesirable. It is also concluded that Proteus Müller 1786 is an objectively invalid name under the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Judicial Opinions 9, 12 and 130 serve as precedents for the conservation of Proteus Hauser 1885 (Approved Lists 1980) over Proteus Müller 1786. This action is taken here and makes the prokaryotic name Proteus legitimate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number006692
JournalInternational journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology
Volume75
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Microbiology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Judicial Opinion 131'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this