Justice during Armed Conflict: A New Dataset on Government and Rebel Strategies

Cyanne E. Loyle, Helga Malmin Binningsbø

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations


While armed conflict is ultimately about violent interaction between combatant groups, a variety of policies are pursued in conjunction with violence that contribute to the course of conflict and its outcomes. One underdeveloped area of research is the use of judicial and quasi-judicial processes during armed conflict. These processes, including trials, truth commissions, reparations, amnesties, purges, or exiles, are directly related to the actions and abuses of the conflict itself—a phenomenon we refer to as during-conflict justice (DCJ). To enable researchers to answer questions about when and why governments and rebels resort to these strategies, and to what effect, we created a global, cross-national dataset which includes 2,205 justice processes implemented during 204 internal armed conflicts between 1946 and 2011. Using these data, this article investigates the conditions under which governments and rebels employ DCJ as well as the potential effects of DCJ usage on conflict dynamics and outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)442-466
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Business, Management and Accounting
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations


Dive into the research topics of 'Justice during Armed Conflict: A New Dataset on Government and Rebel Strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this