TY - JOUR
T1 - Key elements of robust vocabulary instruction for emergent bilingual adolescents
AU - Crosson, Amy C.
AU - McKeown, Margaret G.
AU - Robbins, Kelly P.
AU - Brown, Kathleen J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding was provided by Spencer Foundation (Grant 201400167 awarded to Amy Crosson) and Institute of Education Sciences (Grant R305A160401 awarded to Penn State University). We are grateful to Mariana Achugar, Matt Fields, Michael Kieffer, and William Nagy for guidance regarding research design and intervention development. We are thankful to Amaya Madden for assistance in the preparation of this clinical focus article and to Weiyi Cheng for assistance with data intake and analysis. Many thanks to Jonathan Covel, Debra Friss, Mark McMahon, Christine Tapu, and the administrators, teachers, and students whose collaboration made this research possible and who taught us so much in the process.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - Purpose: In this clinical focus article, the authors argue for robust vocabulary instruction with emergent bilingual learners both in inclusive classroom settings and in clinical settings for emergent bilinguals with language and literacy disordersRobust vocabulary instruction focuses on high-utility academic words that carry abstract meanings and appear in texts across content areas (e.g., diminish, ambiguous). For emergent bilinguals, vocabulary instruction should be infused with morphological analysis emphasizing Latin roots to support students to problem-solve meanings of new, unfamiliar words and make connections between semantic clusters of related words in English. An innovative and critical component of this instructional approach is to support emergent bilinguals to leverage their linguistic resources by making connections to their home languages. Five design principles for teaching emergent bilinguals to engage in morphological analysis with Latin roots are presented. These design principles are illustrated with examples of evidence-based practices from intervention materials for instruction. Examples are drawn from varied instructional contexts. We present a synthesis of findings from implementation trials of our instructional program. Finally, application of the approach to clinical settings for speech-language pathologists are addressed. Conclusions: Clinical practice with emergent bilingual learners at intermediate and advanced stages of proficiency should incorporate robust vocabulary instruction for emergent bilinguals from a variety of cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Clinicians should focus on high-utility academic words, and they should teach morphological problem-solving skills for generative word learning. Clinicians should leverage emergent bilingual learners’ home language resources for developing morphological problem-solving skill.
AB - Purpose: In this clinical focus article, the authors argue for robust vocabulary instruction with emergent bilingual learners both in inclusive classroom settings and in clinical settings for emergent bilinguals with language and literacy disordersRobust vocabulary instruction focuses on high-utility academic words that carry abstract meanings and appear in texts across content areas (e.g., diminish, ambiguous). For emergent bilinguals, vocabulary instruction should be infused with morphological analysis emphasizing Latin roots to support students to problem-solve meanings of new, unfamiliar words and make connections between semantic clusters of related words in English. An innovative and critical component of this instructional approach is to support emergent bilinguals to leverage their linguistic resources by making connections to their home languages. Five design principles for teaching emergent bilinguals to engage in morphological analysis with Latin roots are presented. These design principles are illustrated with examples of evidence-based practices from intervention materials for instruction. Examples are drawn from varied instructional contexts. We present a synthesis of findings from implementation trials of our instructional program. Finally, application of the approach to clinical settings for speech-language pathologists are addressed. Conclusions: Clinical practice with emergent bilingual learners at intermediate and advanced stages of proficiency should incorporate robust vocabulary instruction for emergent bilinguals from a variety of cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Clinicians should focus on high-utility academic words, and they should teach morphological problem-solving skills for generative word learning. Clinicians should leverage emergent bilingual learners’ home language resources for developing morphological problem-solving skill.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073119842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073119842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2019_LSHSS-VOIA-18-0127
DO - 10.1044/2019_LSHSS-VOIA-18-0127
M3 - Article
C2 - 31600466
AN - SCOPUS:85073119842
SN - 0161-1461
VL - 50
SP - 493
EP - 505
JO - Language, speech, and hearing services in schools
JF - Language, speech, and hearing services in schools
IS - 4
ER -