Knowledge

Rachel L. Heinen; Tin L. Nguyen; Samuel T. Hunter

doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23697-3

Knowledge

Rachel L. Heinen, Tin L. Nguyen, Samuel T. Hunter

Psychology

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

Research on the relationship between knowledge and creativity has been divided, with conflicting findings on whether knowledge is beneficial to creative thought. Overall, knowledge itself does not inhibit creativity. Rather, it is a combination of knowledge content and its use that restricts creative ideation. Specifically, both limited knowledge and an overreliance on familiar or domain-specific knowledge can limit one's ability to combine unique information to form creative ideas. This entry discusses how this relationship varies based on the types of knowledge and creativity, the operationalization and measurement of creativity, and how knowledge is used by individuals as well as teams.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Manual of Evidence-Based Admitting Orders and Therapeutics
Publisher	Elsevier
Pages	20-25
Number of pages	6
ISBN (Electronic)	9780128156155
ISBN (Print)	9780128156148
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23697-3
State	Published - Jan 1 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

General Psychology

Access to Document

10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23697-3

Cite this

@inbook{4deff78ab0c24d2bab1abd854450fe91,

title = "Knowledge",

abstract = "Research on the relationship between knowledge and creativity has been divided, with conflicting findings on whether knowledge is beneficial to creative thought. Overall, knowledge itself does not inhibit creativity. Rather, it is a combination of knowledge content and its use that restricts creative ideation. Specifically, both limited knowledge and an overreliance on familiar or domain-specific knowledge can limit one's ability to combine unique information to form creative ideas. This entry discusses how this relationship varies based on the types of knowledge and creativity, the operationalization and measurement of creativity, and how knowledge is used by individuals as well as teams.",

author = "Heinen, {Rachel L.} and Nguyen, {Tin L.} and Hunter, {Samuel T.}",

year = "2020",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23697-3",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9780128156148",

pages = "20--25",

booktitle = "Manual of Evidence-Based Admitting Orders and Therapeutics",

publisher = "Elsevier",

address = "Netherlands",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Knowledge

AU - Heinen, Rachel L.

AU - Nguyen, Tin L.

AU - Hunter, Samuel T.

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Research on the relationship between knowledge and creativity has been divided, with conflicting findings on whether knowledge is beneficial to creative thought. Overall, knowledge itself does not inhibit creativity. Rather, it is a combination of knowledge content and its use that restricts creative ideation. Specifically, both limited knowledge and an overreliance on familiar or domain-specific knowledge can limit one's ability to combine unique information to form creative ideas. This entry discusses how this relationship varies based on the types of knowledge and creativity, the operationalization and measurement of creativity, and how knowledge is used by individuals as well as teams.

AB - Research on the relationship between knowledge and creativity has been divided, with conflicting findings on whether knowledge is beneficial to creative thought. Overall, knowledge itself does not inhibit creativity. Rather, it is a combination of knowledge content and its use that restricts creative ideation. Specifically, both limited knowledge and an overreliance on familiar or domain-specific knowledge can limit one's ability to combine unique information to form creative ideas. This entry discusses how this relationship varies based on the types of knowledge and creativity, the operationalization and measurement of creativity, and how knowledge is used by individuals as well as teams.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171519890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85171519890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23697-3

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23697-3

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85171519890

SN - 9780128156148

SP - 20

EP - 25

BT - Manual of Evidence-Based Admitting Orders and Therapeutics

PB - Elsevier

ER -

Knowledge

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this