Language politics and legitimation crisis in Sweden: A Habermasian approach

Tommaso M. Milani, Sally Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Since the late 1990s the question of whether to ratify the status of Swedish as the "principal" language of Sweden by means of a language law has been subject to considerable public dispute. Drawing on Blommaert's concept of a "language ideological debate," we explore how and why this particular debate seemingly ground to a halt without achieving any kind of tangible closure. In order to do so, we introduce Habermas's notion of "legitimation crisis" and describe how such crises are, according to Habermas, typically underpinned by one or more rationality deficits," i.e. discursive paradoxes that emerge in a given historical, cultural, social and economic context. We then propose that the concept of "legitimation crisis" not only may help to explain why some language ideological debates sometimes reach a stalemate at a specific historical moment as in the Swedish case, but also constitutes a theoretical framework that could be productively incorporated into the study of language politics more generally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-22
Number of pages22
JournalLanguage Problems and Language Planning
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Language politics and legitimation crisis in Sweden: A Habermasian approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this