Abstract
As Large Language Model (LLM) context windows expand, the necessity of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for integrating external knowledge is debated. Existing RAG vs. long-context (LC) LLM comparisons are often inconclusive due to benchmark limitations. We introduce LaRA, a novel benchmark with 2326 test cases across four QA tasks and three long context types, for rigorous evaluation. Our analysis of eleven LLMs reveals the optimal choice between RAG and LC depends on a complex interplay of model capabilities, context length, task type, and retrieval characteristics, offering actionable guidelines for practitioners. Our code and dataset is provided at: https://github.com/Alibaba-NLP/LaRA.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 36846-36867 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Proceedings of Machine Learning Research |
| Volume | 267 |
| State | Published - 2025 |
| Event | 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2025 - Vancouver, Canada Duration: Jul 13 2025 → Jul 19 2025 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Software
- Control and Systems Engineering
- Statistics and Probability
- Artificial Intelligence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'LaRA: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Long-Context LLMs — No Silver Bullet for LC or RAG Routing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver