TY - JOUR
T1 - Latent profile and cluster analysis of infant temperament
T2 - Comparisons across person-centered approaches
AU - Gartstein, Maria A.
AU - Prokasky, Amanda
AU - Bell, Martha Ann
AU - Calkins, Susan
AU - Bridgett, David J.
AU - Braungart-Rieker, Julia
AU - Leerkes, Esther
AU - Cheatham, Carol L.
AU - Eiden, Rina D.
AU - Mize, Krystal D.
AU - Jones, Nancy Aaron
AU - Mireault, Gina
AU - Seamon, Erich
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Psychological Association.
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - There is renewed interest in person-centered approaches to understanding the structure of temperament. However, questions concerning temperament types are not frequently framed in a developmental context, especially during infancy. In addition, the most common person-centered techniques, cluster analysis (CA) and latent profile analysis (LPA), have not been compared with respect to derived temperament types. To address these gaps, we set out to identify temperament types for younger and older infants, comparing LPA and CA techniques. Multiple data sets (N = 1,356; 672 girls, 677 boys) with maternal ratings of infant temperament obtained using the Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (Gartstein & Rothbart, 2003) were combined. All infants were between 3 and 12 months of age (M = 7.85; SD = 3.00). Due to rapid development in the first year of life, LPA and CA were performed separately for younger (n = 731; 3 to 8 months of age) and older (n = 625; 9 to 12 months of age) infants. Results supported 3-profile/cluster solutions as optimal for younger infants, and 5-profile/cluster solutions for the older subsample, indicating considerable differences between early/mid and late infancy. LPA and CA solutions produced relatively comparable types for younger and older infants. Results are discussed in the context of developmental changes unique to the end of the first year of life, which likely account for the present findings.
AB - There is renewed interest in person-centered approaches to understanding the structure of temperament. However, questions concerning temperament types are not frequently framed in a developmental context, especially during infancy. In addition, the most common person-centered techniques, cluster analysis (CA) and latent profile analysis (LPA), have not been compared with respect to derived temperament types. To address these gaps, we set out to identify temperament types for younger and older infants, comparing LPA and CA techniques. Multiple data sets (N = 1,356; 672 girls, 677 boys) with maternal ratings of infant temperament obtained using the Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (Gartstein & Rothbart, 2003) were combined. All infants were between 3 and 12 months of age (M = 7.85; SD = 3.00). Due to rapid development in the first year of life, LPA and CA were performed separately for younger (n = 731; 3 to 8 months of age) and older (n = 625; 9 to 12 months of age) infants. Results supported 3-profile/cluster solutions as optimal for younger infants, and 5-profile/cluster solutions for the older subsample, indicating considerable differences between early/mid and late infancy. LPA and CA solutions produced relatively comparable types for younger and older infants. Results are discussed in the context of developmental changes unique to the end of the first year of life, which likely account for the present findings.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85026535858
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85026535858#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1037/dev0000382
DO - 10.1037/dev0000382
M3 - Article
C2 - 28758787
AN - SCOPUS:85026535858
SN - 0012-1649
VL - 53
SP - 1811
EP - 1825
JO - Developmental psychology
JF - Developmental psychology
IS - 10
ER -