TY - JOUR
T1 - Learning behavior and intelligence as explanations for children's scholastic achievement
AU - Schaefer, Barbara A.
AU - McDermott, Paul A.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - This study assesses the unique and complementary ability of childhood intelligence and learning-related behavior to explain variation in achievement outcomes. Teacher-observed classroom learning behaviors and individually administered intelligence and achievement test performances were collected for a representative national sample (N = 1,100) of students ages 6-17 years. The sample was blocked for age, grade level, and gender, and stratified according to the U.S. Census by race/ethnicity, parent education level, national region, community size, family structure, and educational placement. Teacher-assigned grades were collected for a secondary national sample (N = 420). Hierarchical regression models revealed substantial proportions of assigned grade variance explained primarily by learning behavior and achievement test score variance explained by intelligence. Explanatory patterns remained consistent after control for demographics and alternative intellectual or behavioral variation, and the variance explained jointly by learning behavior, intelligence, and their interactions exceeded appreciably the contributions of any one source. Implications are discussed for educational assessment and intervention.
AB - This study assesses the unique and complementary ability of childhood intelligence and learning-related behavior to explain variation in achievement outcomes. Teacher-observed classroom learning behaviors and individually administered intelligence and achievement test performances were collected for a representative national sample (N = 1,100) of students ages 6-17 years. The sample was blocked for age, grade level, and gender, and stratified according to the U.S. Census by race/ethnicity, parent education level, national region, community size, family structure, and educational placement. Teacher-assigned grades were collected for a secondary national sample (N = 420). Hierarchical regression models revealed substantial proportions of assigned grade variance explained primarily by learning behavior and achievement test score variance explained by intelligence. Explanatory patterns remained consistent after control for demographics and alternative intellectual or behavioral variation, and the variance explained jointly by learning behavior, intelligence, and their interactions exceeded appreciably the contributions of any one source. Implications are discussed for educational assessment and intervention.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033197214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033197214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0022-4405(99)00007-2
DO - 10.1016/S0022-4405(99)00007-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0033197214
SN - 0022-4405
VL - 37
SP - 299
EP - 313
JO - Journal of School Psychology
JF - Journal of School Psychology
IS - 3
ER -