TY - JOUR
T1 - Learning from Waiver States
T2 - Coverage effects under Indiana's HIP medicaid expansion
AU - Freedman, Seth
AU - Richardson, Lilliard
AU - Simon, Kosali I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Project HOPE- The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.
PY - 2018/6/1
Y1 - 2018/6/1
N2 - In 2015, Indiana expanded eligibility for Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) through a unique waiver, Healthy Indiana Plan 2.0, which requires enrollees to make monthly contributions to an account that is similar to a health savings account to receive full benefits. Enrollees who fail to make these contributions receive less generous benefits if their income is below the federal poverty level, and if it is 100-138 percent of poverty, they are locked out of coverage for six months.We estimated the impact of this expansion on coverage rates and compared the effects to results from other states that expanded Medicaid after 2014. We found that Indiana's coverage gains (relative to pre-ACA uninsurance rates) were smaller than gains in neighboring expansion states, but larger than those in other states. These results imply that while one potential reason for Indiana's lower gains relative to neighboring states was its cost-sharing requirements, expansion led to unquestionable coverage gains in the state.
AB - In 2015, Indiana expanded eligibility for Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) through a unique waiver, Healthy Indiana Plan 2.0, which requires enrollees to make monthly contributions to an account that is similar to a health savings account to receive full benefits. Enrollees who fail to make these contributions receive less generous benefits if their income is below the federal poverty level, and if it is 100-138 percent of poverty, they are locked out of coverage for six months.We estimated the impact of this expansion on coverage rates and compared the effects to results from other states that expanded Medicaid after 2014. We found that Indiana's coverage gains (relative to pre-ACA uninsurance rates) were smaller than gains in neighboring expansion states, but larger than those in other states. These results imply that while one potential reason for Indiana's lower gains relative to neighboring states was its cost-sharing requirements, expansion led to unquestionable coverage gains in the state.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048053342&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048053342&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1596
DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1596
M3 - Article
C2 - 29863935
AN - SCOPUS:85048053342
SN - 0278-2715
VL - 37
SP - 936
EP - 943
JO - Health Affairs
JF - Health Affairs
IS - 6
ER -