TY - JOUR
T1 - Learning the spelling of strange words in Dutch benefits from regularized reading
AU - Bosman, Anna M.T.
AU - Van Hell, Janet G.
AU - Verhoeven, Ludo
PY - 2006/11
Y1 - 2006/11
N2 - In 2 experiments, the authors tested the effect of 2 types of reading on the spelling memory of strange or sound-spelling inconsistent words in Dutch students with and without learning disabilities: standard reading and regularized reading. Standard reading refers to reading the word the way it has to be read. Regularized reading refers to reading a sound-spelling inconsistent word as if it is sound-spelling consistent. In Experiment 1, both groups showed a short-term effect. Shortly after training, all students who participated in the regularized-reading condition showed better spelling performance than students who took part in a standard-reading condition. One week after training, spelling knowledge of students without learning disabilities appeared to be more stable than that of students with learning disabilities. In Experiment 2, only students with learning disabilities participated. The results reveal that more training substantially enhanced spelling performance in the long term, and repetition of the regularized word was even more effective. A recurrent network account served as the guiding principle to explain the results. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
AB - In 2 experiments, the authors tested the effect of 2 types of reading on the spelling memory of strange or sound-spelling inconsistent words in Dutch students with and without learning disabilities: standard reading and regularized reading. Standard reading refers to reading the word the way it has to be read. Regularized reading refers to reading a sound-spelling inconsistent word as if it is sound-spelling consistent. In Experiment 1, both groups showed a short-term effect. Shortly after training, all students who participated in the regularized-reading condition showed better spelling performance than students who took part in a standard-reading condition. One week after training, spelling knowledge of students without learning disabilities appeared to be more stable than that of students with learning disabilities. In Experiment 2, only students with learning disabilities participated. The results reveal that more training substantially enhanced spelling performance in the long term, and repetition of the regularized word was even more effective. A recurrent network account served as the guiding principle to explain the results. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750992485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750992485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.879
DO - 10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.879
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33750992485
SN - 0022-0663
VL - 98
SP - 879
EP - 890
JO - Journal of Educational Psychology
JF - Journal of Educational Psychology
IS - 4
ER -