TY - JOUR
T1 - Legislative professionalism and the demand for groups
T2 - The institutional context of interest population density
AU - Berkman, Michael Barth
PY - 2001/1/1
Y1 - 2001/1/1
N2 - Do state interest group systems develop independently of the legislatures they lobby? The Energy-Stability-Area model developed by Gray and Lowery (1996) implicitly suggests they do. I argue that legislative professionalism conditions how group systems respond to environmental factors. As legislatures professionalize, their demand for information from lobbyists decreases. Groups are in this and other ways less effective in professional legislatures and more likely to exit a crowded group system. I model interest density with professionalism as a contextual variable. The results have implications for the number and mix of interests, the impact of lobbying regulations, and the consequences of legislative de-institutionalization.
AB - Do state interest group systems develop independently of the legislatures they lobby? The Energy-Stability-Area model developed by Gray and Lowery (1996) implicitly suggests they do. I argue that legislative professionalism conditions how group systems respond to environmental factors. As legislatures professionalize, their demand for information from lobbyists decreases. Groups are in this and other ways less effective in professional legislatures and more likely to exit a crowded group system. I model interest density with professionalism as a contextual variable. The results have implications for the number and mix of interests, the impact of lobbying regulations, and the consequences of legislative de-institutionalization.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040925657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0040925657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2307/440274
DO - 10.2307/440274
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0040925657
SN - 0362-9805
VL - 26
SP - 661
EP - 679
JO - Legislative Studies Quarterly
JF - Legislative Studies Quarterly
IS - 4
ER -