Leopard frog priorities in choosing between prey at different locations

Elizabeth A. Dudkin, Teri Peiffer, Benjamin Burkitt, Christopher N. Neeb, Edward R. Gruberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Frogs are able to respond to a prey stimulus throughout their 360° ground-level visual field as well as in the superior visual field. We compared the likelihood of frogs choosing between a more nasally located, ground-level prey versus a more temporally located ground-level prey, when the prey at the nasal location is further away from the frog. Two crickets were presented simultaneously at 9 pairs of angles that included both crickets in the binocular visual field, both crickets in the monocular visual field, or one cricket in the binocular field and one in the monocular field. Frogs chose the more nasally located prey at least 71% of the time when the more temporal prey was in the monocular field; and 64% of the time when both prey were in the binocular field. Frogs tended to choose the more nasally located prey, even though it takes the frog longer to reach the prey. In addition, when given a choice between a prey located at ground level versus a prey located in the superior field, frogs tend to choose the prey at ground-level. These results suggest that there is a neural mechanism that biases frogs' responses to prey stimuli.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)138-142
Number of pages5
JournalBehavioural Processes
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2011

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience


Dive into the research topics of 'Leopard frog priorities in choosing between prey at different locations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this