Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Leveraging Dynamic Norms to Reduce College Student Alcohol Use: A Test of Four Mediators

  • Tobias Reynolds-Tylus
  • , Andrea Martinez Gonzalez
  • , Chris Skurka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Social norms are common in persuasive messaging. For norms trending in a positive direction, it may be beneficial to emphasize change (i.e. dynamic norm) rather than the status quo (i.e. static norm). To test this proposition, we examined college students’ responses to social norm messages encouraging moderate alcohol use. Undergraduates (N = 842) were randomly assigned to view a dynamic norm (“More college students drinking in moderation”), a static descriptive norm (“Most college students drink in moderation”), or a no message control. Four mechanisms were examined as potential mediators, three of which have been examined in previous work (preconformity, perceived importance, self-efficacy) and one of which was novel (psychological reactance). Results revealed that exposure to either social norm message (dynamic or static descriptive) was associated with more favorable attitude relative to a no message control. Attitude did not differ between the dynamic norm and static descriptive norm conditions. Only psychological reactance mediated the relationship between message condition (dynamic vs. static descriptive norm) and favorable attitude. Implications and future directions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1371-1382
Number of pages12
JournalHealth Communication
Volume39
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leveraging Dynamic Norms to Reduce College Student Alcohol Use: A Test of Four Mediators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this