TY - JOUR
T1 - Lexical noun phrases in texts written by deaf children and adults with different proficiency levels in sign language
AU - van Beijsterveldt, Liesbeth Maria
AU - van Hell, Janet
N1 - Funding Information:
The first author was supported by grant 015-001-036 from the Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research (NWO), awarded to the second author. This research was also supported by a grant from the Mgr. van Overbeekstichting awarded to the second author. We thank Judith Stofmeel for her help in collecting the data, and Susan Bobb, Daan Hermans and Loes Wauters for their insightful comments on an earlier version of this paper. The database on hearing participants in this study constitutes part of a large-scale cross-linguistic project supported by a major grant from the Spencer Foundation, Chicago, Developing Literacy in Different Languages and Different Contexts (Ruth Berman PI; Verhoeven co-PI on Dutch part).
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - We report an analysis of lexical noun phrases (NPs) in narrative and expository texts written by Dutch deaf individuals from a bimodal bilingual perspective. Texts written by Dutch deaf children and adults who are either proficient in Sign Language of the Netherlands (SLN) or low-proficient in SLN were compared on structures that either overlap in Dutch and SLN (presence of overt subject and object NPs, NP modifiers, and NP-internal agreement), or are absent in SLN (articles). We found that deaf participants experienced significant difficulty with lexical NPs. Further, deaf proficiently signing children (but not adults) more often omitted obligate articles than deaf low-proficiently signing children. Deaf proficiently signing children and adults did not differ from low-proficiently signing children and adults, however, in the use of NP modifiers, NP-agreement errors and omissions of obligatory NPs. We conclude that proficiency in sign language seems to affect particularly those aspects that differ substantially across sign language and oral language, in this case, articles. We argue that adopting a bimodal bilingual approach is important to understand the writing of deaf children.
AB - We report an analysis of lexical noun phrases (NPs) in narrative and expository texts written by Dutch deaf individuals from a bimodal bilingual perspective. Texts written by Dutch deaf children and adults who are either proficient in Sign Language of the Netherlands (SLN) or low-proficient in SLN were compared on structures that either overlap in Dutch and SLN (presence of overt subject and object NPs, NP modifiers, and NP-internal agreement), or are absent in SLN (articles). We found that deaf participants experienced significant difficulty with lexical NPs. Further, deaf proficiently signing children (but not adults) more often omitted obligate articles than deaf low-proficiently signing children. Deaf proficiently signing children and adults did not differ from low-proficiently signing children and adults, however, in the use of NP modifiers, NP-agreement errors and omissions of obligatory NPs. We conclude that proficiency in sign language seems to affect particularly those aspects that differ substantially across sign language and oral language, in this case, articles. We argue that adopting a bimodal bilingual approach is important to understand the writing of deaf children.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953653515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953653515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13670050903477039
DO - 10.1080/13670050903477039
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77953653515
SN - 1367-0050
VL - 13
SP - 439
EP - 468
JO - International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
JF - International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
IS - 4
ER -